“I didn't know that idea.”
Learn the missing concept or technique.
Find the pattern behind a missed problem. Work on what broke. Then check whether the idea holds on mathematics you haven't seen.
For serious secondary-school contest practice.
Start with a problem, not a dashboard of scores.
“I knew complementary counting, but I tried to count every case directly.”
The technique was familiar. The cue to use it went unnoticed.
Repair prompt Name the cue before counting.Solving the original again is only the first check.
Reading a solution can make the insight feel obvious. The useful question is whether you'll find it independently next time.
Miss → Read the solution → Move on
Miss → Diagnose → Repair
→ Retry cold → Test on unseen problems
SolveTrace keeps re-solving and transfer separate, so you can see exactly what a repair has survived.
Find the first meaningful failure.
The same problem, later. No hints or previous work.
The same idea with different surface details.
The same structure with less obvious cues.
The principle in a substantially different setting.
A missing technique needs a different response from a technique you knew but didn't recognize.
Explore the eight failure categories →Learn the missing concept or technique.
Learn the cue that makes the idea useful.
Reconsider the high-level approach.
Locate the arithmetic or bookkeeping slip.
Build a record of the reasoning patterns worth training, with a clear next action when you return.
See the student experience →Understand recurring errors, repair evidence and what still needs testing. More useful than a worksheet count.
See the parent experience →Solve independently. Review your reasoning. Know what to test next.